Down Looking (DL) GPS radio occultation can produce an estimate of the atmospheric refractivity profile. The main observations are the bending angle as a function of the impact parameter. DL Provides both negative as well as positive elevation angle measurements. Abel inversion can be operated on a profile of partial bending angle found by subtracting the positive elevation measurement from the negative one with the same impact parameter. Abel inversion requires the spherical symmetrical assumption. Basically, partial bending calculation removes the ionospheric bending and hence it is possible to use a single frequency GPS receiver. The current paper introduces a simulation data for the case of a receiver on Mountain top. The simulation uses model refractivity from MSISE-90 Model as well as radiosonde data. Random noises are added to the bending angle profile before inversion. The result shows that it is possible to produce accurate vertical refractivity profile below the receiver altitude. The calculation of the water vapor profile is also made using temperature profile information from the MSISE-90 Model as well as radiosonde. The relative errors in the retrieved refractivity profile are always less than 0.2%.
MOUSA, A. (2006). ABEL INVERSION FOR DERIVING REFRACTIVITY PROFILE FROM DOWN LOOKING GPS RADIO OCCULTATION: SIMULATION ANALYSIS. Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 4(1), 143-150. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2006.378468
MLA
A. MOUSA. "ABEL INVERSION FOR DERIVING REFRACTIVITY PROFILE FROM DOWN LOOKING GPS RADIO OCCULTATION: SIMULATION ANALYSIS", Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 4, 1, 2006, 143-150. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2006.378468
HARVARD
MOUSA, A. (2006). 'ABEL INVERSION FOR DERIVING REFRACTIVITY PROFILE FROM DOWN LOOKING GPS RADIO OCCULTATION: SIMULATION ANALYSIS', Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 4(1), pp. 143-150. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2006.378468
VANCOUVER
MOUSA, A. ABEL INVERSION FOR DERIVING REFRACTIVITY PROFILE FROM DOWN LOOKING GPS RADIO OCCULTATION: SIMULATION ANALYSIS. Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 2006; 4(1): 143-150. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2006.378468