It is important in log interpretation to accurately estimate porosity. With the exception of core measurements, the porosity tool responses (density; ρb, neutron; ɸN, and acoustic; Δt) can all be defined by equation in which porosity is a factor, and which can therefore be solved for porosity. Also useful information about porosity can be obtained by using a combination of at least two of these logs. This paper is mainly addressed to shed more light on some approaches used to determine the sonic-derived porosity and to introduce an equation for estimating porosity from acoustic logs. The equation can be simply achieved by merging Raymer et al. (1980) transform and Raiga- Clemenceau et al. (1988) since the first takes into account the effect of matrix and fluid transit time, whereas the second takes only the effect of matrix transit time and matrix nature into consideration. However, the proposed equation combines in its structure all parameters included in both equations, which in our opinion enhances the accuracy of computing porosity from acoustic logs. This equation was tested among a wide variety of samples representing different lithology. The results obtained from its application showed particularly a good agreement with experimental data in various cases subjected to study particularly with clean lithology material.
SOLIMAN, K., & MABROUK, W. (2018). AN IMPROVED APPROACH TO DERIVE POROSITY FROM THE ACOUSTIC LOG. Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 16(1), 111-121. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2018.385798
MLA
K.S. SOLIMAN; W.M. MABROUK. "AN IMPROVED APPROACH TO DERIVE POROSITY FROM THE ACOUSTIC LOG", Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 16, 1, 2018, 111-121. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2018.385798
HARVARD
SOLIMAN, K., MABROUK, W. (2018). 'AN IMPROVED APPROACH TO DERIVE POROSITY FROM THE ACOUSTIC LOG', Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 16(1), pp. 111-121. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2018.385798
VANCOUVER
SOLIMAN, K., MABROUK, W. AN IMPROVED APPROACH TO DERIVE POROSITY FROM THE ACOUSTIC LOG. Journal of Egyptian Geophysical Society, 2018; 16(1): 111-121. doi: 10.21608/jegs.2018.385798